Fort Moore Name Scrapped After Two Years — Army Brings Back Benning With a Twist

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Monday that Fort Moore — the Georgia installation renamed less than two years ago to honor Lt. Gen. Hal Moore and his wife, Julia — will be renamed once again. This time, the Army will revert to the original Fort Benning name, though with a new namesake, World War I hero Cpl. Fred G. Benning, a Distinguished Service Cross recipient.

The change is a legal workaround to satisfy a congressional mandate requiring the removal of Confederate names from military bases. The original Fort Benning was named for Confederate general Henry Benning, who openly fought to preserve slavery. That history made it an obvious target for renaming when Congress ordered the military to cut ties with symbols of the Confederacy.

The decision to rename the base for Hal and Julia Moore in 2023 was widely praised. Hal Moore, a decorated combat leader in Korea and Vietnam, commanded troops in the legendary Battle of Ia Drang Valley — the first large-scale battle between U.S. forces and the North Vietnamese. That fight, immortalized in the book and film We Were Soldiers, also marked the first major use of helicopter air assault tactics, setting the template for modern warfare. Moore, a Distinguished Service Cross recipient, died in 2017.

Julia Moore’s contributions were no less profound. Her efforts to reform how the military notified families of fallen troops led to the compassionate, face-to-face process still in use today — replacing the cold telegrams that once delivered the worst news a family could receive. She died in 2004.

On top of their combined legacy, Hal Moore was also a forward-thinker on integration in the ranks, pushing for Black and white soldiers to serve together during his time in Korea — years before equal opportunity became official Army policy.

Now, the Army has decided to overwrite all that — not to restore the Confederate general’s legacy, but to keep the Benning name intact under a new, legally compliant banner. It’s a bureaucratic two-step that raises the question: If the Army wanted to honor real American heroes like the Moores, why the sudden rush to replace them?

If Fort Moore couldn’t last two years, what is the standard for who gets honored — and who gets erased?